We Are Finally Getting Better at Polls

New forecasting methods.

Photographer: Leon Neal/AFP/Getty Images

Back in late 2016, following a year of political upsets, I argued here that political polling and forecasting wasn’t dead but needed to adapt. Fast forward a little over a year, and change is already apparent.

Polls in the U.K. badly missed in the 2015 general election, showing a tied result when then Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron’s emerged with a six-and-a-half point margin of victory. They wrongly predicted a Remain victory in the 2016 referendum on European Union membership and were wildly off-target again in the 2017 general election. In the U.S., state polls – particularly in states where whites without college degrees are numerous – missed key swing state victories for Donald Trump in 2016. 

Although the magnitude of polling misses hasn’t changed much over time, the number of close, high-stakes contests has increased the risk of a bad call on a major vote. This matters especially in the U.K., because in a winner-takes-all electoral system (as opposed to one that uses proportional representation) even modest errors in the popular vote translate into much larger errors in the share of seats won.

Source

Leave a Reply